okotavio Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 http://iscale.iheart.com/catalog/album/41727554?ops=fit(480%2C480)Â bigger-ish. Looks like a single cover to me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, Otávio Vidal said: http://iscale.iheart.com/catalog/album/41727554?ops=fit(480%2C480) bigger-ish. Looks like a single cover to me Posted to imgur, you know, just in case.  We need someone to tell us if this is a placeholder or not goddamit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GuitarPunk94 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 well I guess this means we are one step closer to revrad/revolution radio Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 3 minutes ago, Otávio Vidal said: http://iscale.iheart.com/catalog/album/41727554?ops=fit(480%2C480) bigger-ish. Looks like a single cover to me you can adjust it even bigger  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian's Inferno! Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Revrad confirmed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheap Escape Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Just now, Andres said: We need someone to tell us if this is a placeholder or not goddamit. This seems a little too elaborate to be a placeholder, in my humble opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Second favourite son Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Oooh I hope that's the actual cover... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Billie Hoe Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Did a google backwards search and nothing popped up. This is the only picture. Holy fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Just now, Cheap Escape said: This seems a little too elaborate to be a placeholder, in my humble opinion. My only hesitation is that it doesn't seem at all in the style of the artist who's doing the cover art. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
okotavio Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Just now, Cheap Escape said: This seems a little too elaborate to be a placeholder, in my humble opinion. That's what I thought. Placeholders are usually pretty basic Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
localinsomniac Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 If this is real, it's interesting they would go with the imagery again. They used a boom box in the artwork for Kill the DJ too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Second favourite son Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Just now, Andres said: My only hesitation is that it doesn't seem at all in the style of the artist who's doing the cover art. Has the band ever used different artists for single covers Vs album covers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Second favourite son Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 Just now, localinsomniac said: If this is real, it's interesting they would go with the imagery again. They used a boom box in the artwork for Kill the DJ too. Subtle way of putting that stage of their career behind them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kripack Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 minute ago, localinsomniac said: If this is real, it's interesting they would go with the imagery again. They used a boom box in the artwork for Kill the DJ too. The boom box on fire may mean sth like "fuck the trilogy" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 I will caution people, as I'm one to do, to try not to read too much into it unless we have some more information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon Benjamin Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 minute ago, kripack said: The boom box on fire may mean sth like "fuck the trilogy" People said the same about the Demolicious cover Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Justin1 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 The only thing I find weird about the whole 'Revolution Radio' thing is that I find it hard to believe Green Day would name their album after a popular conspiracy theory website/podcast. They've always seemed pro Obama/Liberalism and Revolution Radio is very anti-Obama pro Trump/Alex Jones type stuff. I dunno, guess it doesn't matter and sounds kinda cool. http://revolutionradio.org  Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheap Escape Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 minute ago, Andres said: My only hesitation is that it doesn't seem at all in the style of the artist who's doing the cover art. That's true, but I suppose it's possible that they used a different artist for this single's cover (due to either the availability of Frank Maddocks, or the desire to work with another artist). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Second favourite son Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 I've tried to be relatively reserved and calm about the new album, but that (potential) cover has excited me a great deal. Â While they went full promotional machine on the trilogy, the radio on fire says to me that they're gonna let the music do the talking this time round, and it's gonna be explosive and blow us away. Whether this turns out to be the single artwork or not, I do know one thing: holy fuck am IÂ excited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EffingBillie Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 minute ago, Andres said: I will caution people, as I'm one to do, to try not to read too much into it unless we have some more information. Do we have anyone to confirm or deny this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chin for a Day Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 5 minutes ago, Jake69 said: I like it. I agree. I,think depending on how it ot used it can clue iconic. Â It is simple but stands out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bronni Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 minute ago, Justin1 said: The only thing I find weird about the whole 'Revolution Radio' thing is that I find it hard to believe Green Day would name their album after a popular conspiracy theory website/podcast. They've always seemed pro Obama/Liberalism and Revolution Radio is very anti-Obama pro Trump/Alex Jones type stuff. I dunno, guess it doesn't matter and sounds kinda cool. http://revolutionradio.org  Acknowledging problems in your government doesn't make you a conspiracy theorist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan86 Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 1 minute ago, EffingBillie said: Do we have anyone to confirm or deny this? Time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 2 minutes ago, Justin1 said: The only thing I find weird about the whole 'Revolution Radio' thing is that I find it hard to believe Green Day would name their album after a popular conspiracy theory website/podcast. They've always seemed pro Obama/Liberalism and Revolution Radio is very anti-Obama pro Trump/Alex Jones type stuff. I dunno, guess it doesn't matter and sounds kinda cool. http://revolutionradio.org  I can almost guarantee that this is not at all related. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beerjeezus Posted August 7, 2016 Share Posted August 7, 2016 If that is the cover I like the simplicity of it but looking at Maddock's work made me expect something else. I guess I'll live with this if it's the cover. Not bad. I like that it's a clear statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.