Jump to content

Trilogy Discussion


Guest

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, RisingRedWolf said:

And your opinion is fine, but it's still your opinion. I prefer the AI/21CB era because it just sounded like a more ambitious, natural evolution of the band and the harmonies and instruments sounded incredible.

I've been listening to Breakdown today and it's a really great album.   I had almost forgot how freaking good it is.    I've listened to Dookie, Warning, Nimrod while driving lately and they are all so good.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thatdude03 said:

I've been listening to Breakdown today and it's a really great album.   

So have I:)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thatdude03 said:

I've been listening to Breakdown today and it's a really great album.   I had almost forgot how freaking good it is.    I've listened to Dookie, Warning, Nimrod while driving lately and they are all so good.   

Yeah I still really love all those albums, Scattered is one of my all time favorite songs period. I've also really been into Insomniac lately too, and with the band recently returning to that big guitar sound, its made me appreciate them even more. AI and 21CB hold a very special place in my heart though and they are by far my favorite albums of all time. I'm really hoping RevRad will join them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know this thread is about the trilogy but I just wanted to add that I adore 21CB. It's probably my favourite album - it was the first era I really experienced as a fan, I was in a good place at the time and I loved how flourishy and ambitious it was. I also saw them live for the first time during that era and their Rock Band thingy came out then too. I miss 2009. :P 

The trilogy I think leaves a bad taste because we now know they weren't in a particularly good place at the time. I still like a lot of songs from it though!

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trilogy was the best thing they made since warning. What are you talking about?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MMwhatsername said:

Maybe my emotions get mixed up a little because when the trilogy came out, I went through a very tough time, I was severely sick back then. So I think listening to trilogy-songs will always leave a slightly bad taste in my mouth, maybe because of my personal experience, maybe because of the trilogy-release that turned into a nightmare, or maybe both.

I feel the same way. My mom got very sick right around the time the trilogy came out, and it was a pretty difficult time for me. Between my personal issues and the band's issues that came to light, I was a bit of a mess (and I'm not a messy person in general, lol). I think it was particularly hard because Green Day had ALWAYS been there for me when I was going through a hard time, and this time, when I needed them the most, they were only adding to my stress and worry. I know this sounds silly and selfish to say, but at the time I think I resented them a bit for making my life even darker when they were supposed to be my bright spot. But in the end, I learned that I needed to work more on creating my own happiness and drawing strength from within, which at 19 is indeed important to realize.

It's difficult for me to divorce everything I was feeling at that time from the songs themselves. And yet, Brutal Love is in my mind one of the best songs they've ever written. I know it's probably not a time they want to revisit too much, but I do hope they hang on to some of the highlights, because there are some spectacular gems in there.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/8/2016 at 6:12 AM, Steven Seagull said:

21CB sound was not good at all. So much static and stupid effects that you don't need. If we're talking about their best sound it's something of a mix between Kerplunk and Dookie. Also the vocals were the best on those two albums. 

You're completely mad.

Kerplunk is a hell of an album, but the quality of the vocals is shit compared to the likes of American Idiot or 21CB.

I've always felt that the guitar,the bass and the drums were too overwhelming and the vocals got drowned in Kerplunk, they never stand out.

I know you like to be the minority in everything n shit, but this is just stupid hahaha, you can't compare Kerplunk's vocals quality with post 2000 Green Day.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, StefanoBras said:

You're completely mad.

Kerplunk is a hell of an album, but the quality of the vocals is shit compared to the likes of American Idiot or 21CB.

I've always felt that the guitar,the bass and the drums were too overwhelming and the vocals got drowned in Kerplunk.

I know you like to be the minority in everything n shit, but this is just stupid hahaha, you can't compare Kerplunk's vocals quality with post 2000 Green Day.

Those vocals are raw and sound like a punk rock band. AI and 21CB vocals are just so lame and overproduced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Clayish said:

Most delusional poster on this forum.

At this point, I can't believe his serious. Must be trolling or something.

I mean, I love early Green Day. Paper Lanterns, 80, 1000 Hours.. those are my jams, but it's a fact that the quality in AI and 21CB (and at some stages, even the trilogy) it's far better than those early releases. In every aspect.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said:

Those vocals are raw and sound like a punk rock band. AI and 21CB vocals are just so lame and overproduced.

The trilogy is way more overproduced

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AI, 21CB "quality", ???,  ok :lol:

When you are talking about that signature Green Day sound no one will mention AI, like EVER. You can make sound super nice but it's the rawnes of their early records what Green Day is. Trilogy and its production fit great together.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Steven Seagull said:

AI, 21CB "quality", ???,  ok :lol:

When you are talking about that signature Green Day sound no one will mention AI, like EVER. You can make sound super nice but it's the rawnes of their early records what Green Day is. Trilogy and it's production fit great together.

I'm literally crying with laughter now. Yes, you're right, no one will mention Green Day's best selling album after Dookie :lol:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ACTUALLY, the real 'rawness' can only be heard on the first two records, which was also result of low budget the band had at the time.

Dookie was polished, and so were the next albums from that point on. There will always be purists, which is totally ok, but there are also a lot of assholes among them, who are just babbling about the same fucking thing all the time, whose 'arguments' can't really be taken seriously if you look at them from a logical and wider, objective point of view (which avoids personal favorism of albums).

Also, a lot of these fans who preach 'rawness' and first records, became fans maybe a couple of years ago, whose first GD music they heard was trilogy or Breakdown. I guess some of them have a complex of sort, so they need to prove their 'real' fan status to I don't even know who, by saying old school music is better than new or whatever.

I don't know, it's really dumb and pointless. 

Also, at least some musical and producing knowledge would be desirable in pointless shit talk about term that doesn't exist - overproduced.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not at all. If you're not tone deaf you can hear why the early records are so much better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, WhiteTim said:

Actually NO it's not... 

Well it sounds more overproduced

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it's underproduced but the vocals sound over produced with the high pass and compression. There's still some great songs on the Trilogy, I hope we get to hear a few on the tour.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure some of you get the meaning of 'tone deaf' - it concerns tones, tonality and abillity to distinguish them (even better, sing them)

But i guess, after reading that early records sound better, a term 'production quality deaf' would be more appropriate..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a big fan of the trilogy.  Yes, it has problems (Nightlife) but it also has some of the best songs of GD's career (Sweet 16, X-Kid, 8th Ave Serenade, Lazy Bones).  And I realize I'm in the minority with Sweet 16 and I don't care.  Great fucking song.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...