DannyDirnt Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 I. need. a beanie... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tubbie Head Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 Mike has the absolutely cutest children. I agree Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BazingaofSuburbia Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 aw yeah hate that, too...though well, it's true but it's also true that these people who kill other people probably couldn't kill anyone if they didn't have any guns, so in the end it's the guns that kill people anyways... it is true but seeing it all over the comments is so annoying, you don't need to tell the man twice and the sales of beanies are going to shoot up this year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elena Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 it is true but seeing it all over the comments is so annoying, you don't need to tell the man twice and the sales of beanies are going to shoot up this year i didn't mean it like that, i meant it more in a way that it's true but just half of the truth (and then the rest of my comment )...in short: yeah these comments are annoying haha oh yeah xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BazingaofSuburbia Posted December 17, 2012 Share Posted December 17, 2012 i didn't mean it like that, i meant it more in a way that it's true but just half of the truth (and then the rest of my comment haha oh yeah xD I knew what you meant don't worry I try not to read the comments but curiosity always gets the best of me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie, get your gun Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Sometimes I wonder (and it's not a matter of who's the most "popular") why Billie Joe has the most followers on ig (almost 93.000) and Mike and Tré less than 50.000. And it's not that it bothers me or anything, but... if you're a fan of the band, why you don't follow the whole band? I'm afraid that most of those followers are nothing but <Billie Joe Armstrong's> fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Femme Gauche Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 @Mike's pic I knew there was a reason I've been knitting so many damned hats lately XD. A few based off of the album covers, too. Dirnt and son look trop adorable, too XD. Seriously, those Dirnt-y kids are too cute. I doubt he stops thinking about this stuff, just like anyone else he probably has it on his mind all the time, mixed in with everything else. that's where we get songs that mention things like Katrina and racism, and the 99% /occupy movement. But you can't just keep talking about it all the time, it's just not realistic for most people. Some people find it to be their calling or what have you... that's cool, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malleus Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Sometimes I wonder (and it's not a matter of who's the most "popular") why Billie Joe has the most followers on ig (almost 93.000) and Mike and Tré less than 50.000. And it's not that it bothers me or anything, but... if you're a fan of the band, why you don't follow the whole band? I'm afraid that most of those followers are nothing but <Billie Joe Armstrong's> fans You basically just said that it's not a matter of who's the most popular but Billie Joe is the most popular. He is, and that is why he has more followers. A lot of people just tend to care about the frontman of bands they are interested in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cath Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Yes it's sad but it will always be that way. People are like OMG BILLYYYYY IS SO SEXY (I know it's Billie not Billy) And he is the one who writes the song, the main SINGER. thats what people most keep in mind after they hear or see them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Annie, get your gun Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 If they love him so much then why people didn't do what he said on twitter: "follow Tré's ig", "follow Mike's ig"?? I know. I just felt like saying that but I answered my own question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whatsername0000 Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 aww mike has the cutest children!! His son looks particularly like him in this picture! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unholy Sister of Grace Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 And he is the one who writes the song, the main SINGER. thats what people most keep in mind after they hear or see them I was watching a comedy show with my mom, totally forgot who it was, this Asian/Irish comedian I think? Anyway, he was talking about bands and he said girls particularly paid more attention to the lead singer, then the guitar player (if they're not the same guy), then bass player then drums (and then keyboard, which, wtf) and it was really funny, but it's really true. In a Rolling Stone interview, Mike or Tre said that they were a democracy with an elected leader (Beej) but he's not the only one. He's the most famous of the three, if that makes any sense, and although some may disagree he is the most conventionally attractive member. I know I had a good friend whose favorite band was Panic! at the Disco and at first Brendon Urie was her favorite, but as time went on she found herself favoring Spencer Smith, the drummer, more. I know that I used to be Billie Billie Billie! but now as I've gotten deeper into the band Mike is slowly becoming my favorite. I'm not gonna be high and mighty and say I don't pick favorites either, because as is my human nature I do. I love them all, truly. Anyway. That's my take on why BJ has more Instagram followers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Snark Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 I'm hopping on the 'Ewwwww feet!' train. They creep me out so much. aw yeah hate that, too...though well, it's true but it's also true that these people who kill other people probably couldn't kill anyone if they didn't have any guns, so in the end it's the guns that kill people anyways... But if they didn't have a gun, they'd just find a knife, bat, rope, chainsaw, pitchfork, bomb, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schlappy Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 But if they didn't have a gun, they'd just find a knife, bat, rope, chainsaw, pitchfork, bomb, etc... you cant mow down 20 preschoolers with a baseball bat though can you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthehallwaynow Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 you cant mow down 20 preschoolers with a baseball bat though can you youd be surprised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sarcasm Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 I'm hopping on the 'Ewwwww feet!' train. They creep me out so much. But if they didn't have a gun, they'd just find a knife, bat, rope, chainsaw, pitchfork, bomb, etc...This argument is just silly... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mar Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Brixton is so fucking cute. He was so presh in Quatro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schlappy Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 youd be surprised yeah i would be. you think the outcome would have been the same if that man had a bat? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unholy Sister of Grace Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 yeah i would be. you think the outcome would have been the same if that man had a bat? At the risk of sounding haggy, there is a gun thread. I still want to respond here though - The outcome would have been different. Less people would have died, if any at all, unless this guy was specially trained in killing people with bats, which is unlikely. If he came in with a bat, no one would have taken him seriously, probably. At least not like they did with the guns. But he still had intentions of killing people, that is the problem, no matter his weapon of choice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthehallwaynow Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 yeah i would be. you think the outcome would have been the same if that man had a bat? are you asking me seriously? or is that a joke? my first comment was sarcasm..of course it wouldn't have maybe your being sarcastic too but i cant tell through text... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Snark Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Oh jeez...are you guys serious? I was just making a point that if someone wants to kill bad enough, they'll find the means to do it. And back on topic... Mike and Brixton are ridiculously cute. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthehallwaynow Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 Oh jeez...are you guys serious? I was just making a point that if someone wants to kill bad enough, they'll find the means to do it. And back on topic... Mike and Brixton are ridiculously cute. can brixton swing a bat?... sorry just kidding had to Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schlappy Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 At the risk of sounding haggy, there is a gun thread. I still want to respond here though - The outcome would have been different. Less people would have died, if any at all, unless this guy was specially trained in killing people with bats, which is unlikely. If he came in with a bat, no one would have taken him seriously, probably. At least not like they did with the guns. But he still had intentions of killing people, that is the problem, no matter his weapon of choice. yeah i know shouldnt really be talking about this here, sorry! But i'm on your side, should probably look back a bit for the whole conversation if you're curious. However about the last bit, having the intention to kill is miles from actually doing it so fuck yeah it matters what weapons are available. If someone has the intent to kill but all they can get their hands on is a rock, its much less of a problem. are you asking me seriously? or is that a joke? my first comment was sarcasm..of course it wouldn't have maybe your being sarcastic too but i cant tell through text... No i didnt see the sarcasm in your comment. Anyway, this probably isnt the time and place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inthehallwaynow Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 yeah i know shouldnt really be talking about this here, sorry! But i'm on your side, should probably look back a bit for the whole conversation if you're curious. However about the last bit, having the intention to kill is miles from actually doing it so fuck yeah it matters what weapons are available. If someone has the intent to kill but all they can get their hands on is a rock, its much less of a problem. No i didnt see the sarcasm in your comment. Anyway, this probably isnt the time and place very true my apologies Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ritz Posted December 18, 2012 Share Posted December 18, 2012 AwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.