Jump to content

Saviors- reviews


emenius

Recommended Posts

A lot of people didn’t really “get” American Idiot at first, wasn’t really until BOBD that it started to become a monster. I remember the first month or so after its release it seemed like only a handful of people understood how great it was. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't we get a full track by track album review? These music journalists are lazy as fk! 

Anyone who describes an acoustic ballad as dad rock is a fkn tool!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The embargo is lifted on the 15th so maybe we'll get some more in-depth reviews/track-by-tracks around then.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, The Grohl said:

It's not laziness. I write reviews for various publications and it's all about hitting that deadline. If you're lucky you get the album a few weeks in advance to make your deadline. Sometimes it's only a few days. They want to get these reviews out ideally before the album drops because the week after it comes out they're already moving on to the next thing. It's all about timing, which honestly sucks the fun out of reviews.

It's such little details about a major release the best review so far was the Italian billboard article and they gave away some lyrics to each song as well 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ekim said:

It's such little details about a major release the best review so far was the Italian billboard article and they gave away some lyrics to each song as well 

True but they had plenty of time with the record. When you don't have as much time and need to meet a deadline there's a higher chance you just churn out generic mush that's not saying much. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The “dad rock” comment is weird to me because there’s music people literally categorize as “dad rock,” as in something a dad would listen to (which is dumb), but this song is literally about being a dad, so who knows what the writer even meant by that lol.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ekim said:

The guy who wrote this probably thinks maroon 5 are great 

Not sure where you came to that conclusion. Moves Like Jagger is okay, but I don't care for them much otherwise.

I say this more from the standpoint of a Gen Z guy who just hates that music in general has to be stigmatized. I highly respect the artists who made rap the phenomenon it is today, and keep it going strong to this day, and hate that boomers stigmatize it, etc.

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Yosuke Hanamura said:

Not sure where you came to that conclusion. Moves Like Jagger is okay, but I don't care for them much otherwise.

I say this more from the standpoint of a Gen Z guy who just hates that music in general has to be stigmatized. I highly respect the artists who made rap the phenomenon it is today, and keep it going strong to this day, and hate that boomers stigmatize it, etc.

Rolling stone magazine lost credibility when they started putting boybands on the cover in the late 90s early 2000s this guy shouldn't have been the one reviewing the album should've went with a seasoned music journalist 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ekim said:

Rolling stone magazine lost credibility when they started putting boybands on the cover in the late 90s early 2000s this guy shouldn't have been the one reviewing the album should've went with a seasoned music journalist 

Ohh, I misread your past comment. I thought you meant "The guy who wrote this comment probably thinks Maroon 5 are great."

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ekim said:

Rolling stone magazine lost credibility when they started putting boybands on the cover in the late 90s early 2000s this guy shouldn't have been the one reviewing the album should've went with a seasoned music journalist 

Kory grow has been there since 2014, not exactly rookie but the way he reviewed this was very amateur no credible music journalist should use the term "dad rock" 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, billy1986 said:

Did rolling stone stop doing away with giving stars in reviews?

I think this is not the main RS review, they have both a main one giving stars (also published online), and then other journalists giving shorter reviews like this. I remember the same happened for FOAM and RevRad. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Yosuke Hanamura said:

Can we please let the term "dad rock" die? I don't care how It's used, the term is so fucking cynical and dismissive of a song's quality. Much like "mumble rap".

Agreed, the term is basically used for every rock band over 40 by now, which is honestly just dumb. As if musicians of a certain age can’t make good music anymore. Every generation has its heroes and music keeps changing all the time but songs aren’t bad or boring just because middle-aged men like them. People call bands like the Beatles or Pink Floyd das rock and act as if these bands didn’t have a massive cultural impact. Just let people enjoy their favorite artists without shaming them for it.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CherryBombs&Gasoline said:

Agreed, the term is basically used for every rock band over 40 by now, which is honestly just dumb. As if musicians of a certain age can’t make good music anymore. Every generation has its heroes and music keeps changing all the time but songs aren’t bad or boring just because middle-aged men like them. People call bands like the Beatles or Pink Floyd das rock and act as if these bands didn’t have a massive cultural impact. Just let people enjoy their favorite artists without shaming them for it.

It’s ageist 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you guys all forget that 90 percent of music critics don't really have any musical education nor are musicians. Just like any music fan, they listen to a lot of different music and have an opinion. But what does that mean? Therefore it's a really weird situation where a musical artist or a band needs good reviews, but at the same time those are given by mostly incompetent people. The same thing is where an average listener can't really perceive music in its entirety in contrast to someone who plays and actually understands music, but at the same time, an artist is making music exactly for those same people (apart for themselves and their passion and love for music).

I never cared what any critic had to say about music, because ultimately, I am the best critic for my own taste in music, and so is every other person for theirs. Music critics are only here for the business part of the industry, and it will always be like that.

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Christian's Inferno! said:

Idk why you're so angry all the time. Every time I see you comment here you're complaining about something or calling other artists shit

The ”Ignore” feature of this forum is very useful 🙂

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...