Jump to content

Father of all Motherfuckers - What are your thoughts on the new album?


BeachBum

Recommended Posts

10 hours ago, pacejunkie punk said:

That’s actually an interesting point because while you would think shorter songs would be easier to digest, sometimes the opposite is true because they can feel incomplete and ultimately unsatisfying. I listen to Tony Molina and have a similar issue because nearly all of his songs are anywhere from thirty seconds to a minute long and he has albums of 10-15 minutes total. The songs are great and full of potential but at the same time so frustrating I actually find his short albums harder to listen to because everything feels incomplete. It’s like leaving off that final note every time after a while I can’t take it anymore.

I wonder if FOAM is having a similar effect, like if some of these songs were just thirty seconds longer or the album five or ten minutes longer at most it would be a more satisfying listen.  Like shorter isn’t always better there’s a limit.

Totally. The first time I noticed this as a possible issue with short songs, was on a new album by my other favorite band. Most of the songs were normal length and then there was one that was really short. Despite listening to the album intently for weeks, I  DIDNT NOTICE the short song. Someone mentioned it and I realized I couldn’t even recall it. Took seeing it live for it to imprint on my brain. And I have a really short attention span! But when I get distracted during JOS, the song is still on when I refocus 😏.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, RisingRedWolf said:

There are countless amounts of reasons why this is a massive troll

Although I desperately want to believe, I just can't imagine this is a troll. I think they genuinely wanted to put this album out. Other than the weak album and talking about being off their contract, there's been no real evidence that this is a troll album. They haven't spoken negatively about the label once. It's quite possible they will even end up renewing the contract. Plus it would be a real shitty way to treat the fans to put out a troll album and charge for it.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, michael1989 said:

Plus it would be a real shitty way to treat the fans to put out a troll album and charge for it.

This.

Green Day selling Bundle at $150 on their store. If it was a troll they would have sold it wayyyyy lessss than that. 

  • Haha 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, michael1989 said:

Plus it would be a real shitty way to treat the fans to put out a troll album and charge for it.

Take the money and cra-a-a-a-awl.

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, pacejunkie punk said:

That’s actually an interesting point because while you would think shorter songs would be easier to digest, sometimes the opposite is true because they can feel incomplete and ultimately unsatisfying. I listen to Tony Molina and have a similar issue because nearly all of his songs are anywhere from thirty seconds to a minute long and he has albums of 10-15 minutes total. The songs are great and full of potential but at the same time so frustrating I actually find his short albums harder to listen to because everything feels incomplete. It’s like leaving off that final note every time after a while I can’t take it anymore.

 

But then you have those early Black Flag EPs and it's the complete opposite

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hard time getting into genres like grindcore that have super short songs but I don’t really mind the shortness on FOAM. It feels like the album ends just when I start getting into it, but other than that, it’s not an issue

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, kaylubd said:

Yeah I don't really mind its length but I still think one, maybe two more songs would've made the album feel more complete. Otherwise I still love it. Makes me sad that it's being precieved as a flop. And the extreme hate is...wow. I get not liking it but some of these reviews are just over the top brutal.

You might find when you hear the other 7 songs that the best 3 of those swapped with the worst 3 on Foam may make it feel more complete even with a 10 song tracklist 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beerjeezus said:

I have a feeling this album has a better reception outside of the narrow circle of the fandom. Most reviews were from OK to positive. 

Green day will always be judged in the shadow of their previous work 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sheenius said:

Green day will always be judged in the shadow of their previous work 

I get that but it doesn’t make FOAM any less fun for me

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Beerjeezus said:

I get that but it doesn’t make FOAM any less fun for me

I get that 100% I enjoy the album as well the stronger songs are a lot of fun but objectively the album deserves exactly a 68-72 out of 100.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Sheenius said:

I get that 100% I enjoy the album as well the stronger songs are a lot of fun but objectively the album deserves exactly a 68-72 out of 100.

Yeah you’re right but that still makes it a good and enjoyable album. I get that it isn’t everyone’s cup of tea but I just don’t see where’s all the hate coming from

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sheenius said:

I guess with Rev Rad everyone's expectation was for GD to kinda of repeat that or build off of 21cb. The latter being a great thing for them to try at some point but that requires a certain level of inspiration for it to be successful. 

But looking at the album and a song like Graffitia, it's one of the best songs they've ever written and one of their best closing songs ever. Sugar Youth, Take The Money and Crawl are great as well. Hell, even Junkies On A High is a fun listen I think it may have been a better single choice than Oh Yeah. 

I went through the lyrics recently and they're fun as hell with it's simplicity but the implications of deeper things are there. Really hard for a band to do when they said everything they had to say 2 decades ago.

That´s true. I was expecting they might go for a 21CB follow-up but FOAM is no disappointment. In the end it’s a fun album and that’s what matters.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Beerjeezus said:

I was expecting they might go for a 21CB follow-up 

This is also Green Day, at any time they could pull it out of their back pocket. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, That Dude said:

No matter what they sound like or the quality of their work, the reviews always go to the fact that it isn't American Idiot.  

 

and Warning and Nimrod weren't Dookie 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sheenius said:

and Warning and Nimrod weren't Dookie 

 

And good for them!  Dookie IS classic Green Day, but give me the perfection that is Green Day circa 1997-2004 any day.  

I love Dookie, but Nimrod started all this insanity for me.

Warning cemented the band as a household name for my whole family.

American Idiot shook my soul.

And the hits just keep a coming! 

I guess what I'm saying....f#!k Dookie! 

Haha.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, DadBod said:

neither was Insomniac 

Actually Insomniac was received really well atleast here in Canada. 

Insomniac was actually a pretty decent seller for the band. If I'm not mistaken it was their fastest album to go platinum in the 90's. 

It just seems to be overlooked in later years and the band is to blame by including barely any songs from their best album in the set. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Beerjeezus said:

I get that but it doesn’t make FOAM any less fun for me

I agree on the fact it's "fun" for me too. I'm just trying to stay objective. It has been on repeat in my ears and in my head, all the songs from FOAMF have been. But then I go into that mode of objectivity and my brain is like, hey wait, what? Did Billie Joe really write this filler shit and he takes it seriously? It's true that all of Green Day's work will always be kept being compared to the insanely popular era, my mind just probably takes it that way. FOAMF is fun as hell to listen to and is insanely catchy, the main argument here is that Billie can do better. That's why the fandom is disappointed in the album, we all were expecting something more than a 26-minute filler. That's what leads many to think it's just a "fuck you Warnerrrrrs" album.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

People take junk about the title and artwork of FOAM....but Dookie.

Also, while the artwork is iconic - it's not great.

Dookie is dookie.

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...