Guest Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, Jirachi said: Bratwurst came from people making jokey fake tracklistings i think? I can assure you Bratwurst is very much a real Green Day song. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jirachi Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Nightlife said: I can assure you Bratwurst is very much a real Green Day song. Shhh, that's a government secret, we can't just tell anybody! u_u 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lenny Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 20 minutes ago, DookieLukie said: If Magnum Opus is Hillary, we'll have another phoned in, poser album. I heard it won't be available for purchase or streaming in the swing states 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green day is Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 32 minutes ago, Flashback said: Just take a look at TESS or ASCAP, you‘ll see You can transfer any of your intellectual property rights you want for whatever reason you want tho. You said they're non-transferable which is wrong. Also they can own them and therefore show up as such on ASCAP and still give Warner (or anyone else) exclusive licence over them, which is basically the same as Warner owning them for the years that that lasts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTim Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 There’s a lot of artists who don’t own their own publishing escp the old stuff artists like Rolling Stones old label owns the publishing to the songs artists owning their publishing has only been happening in the last 25 years or so 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flashback Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 39 minutes ago, green day is said: You can transfer any of your intellectual property rights you want for whatever reason you want tho. You said they're non-transferable which is wrong. Also they can own them and therefore show up as such on ASCAP and still give Warner (or anyone else) exclusive licence over them, which is basically the same as Warner owning them for the years that that lasts. Seems that Europe is a bit composer-friendlier than the US 😂 But that‘s exactly the point: Warner owns the exclusive distribution rights, but not the record itself, this is what i wanted to say. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ross_19 Posted September 11, 2019 Popular Post Share Posted September 11, 2019 I can't wait for my unicorn socks 5 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan86 Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 54 minutes ago, WhiteTim said: There’s a lot of artists who don’t own their own publishing escp the old stuff artists like Rolling Stones old label owns the publishing to the songs artists owning their publishing has only been happening in the last 25 years or so Do the masters always come back to the artist after a certain amount of time? I heard Noel Gallagher on about this recently, seems he is getting the masters of all the Oasis music after 30 years, which is in a 3-4 years time. starts at the 50 second mark here if you are interested Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhiteTim Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 6 minutes ago, Alan86 said: Do the masters always come back to the artist after a certain amount of time? I heard Noel Gallagher on about this recently, seems he is getting the masters of all the Oasis music after 30 years, which is in a 3-4 years time. starts at the 50 second mark here if you are interested It all depends on labels & contracts etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan86 Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 1 minute ago, WhiteTim said: It all depends on labels & contracts etc I was thinking that could be the case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 I love how active they are on social media right now. It's only natural considering the announcement was just made but I sure hope they keep it up! Also hoping they'll make up for the lack of pro shot footage during the RevRad era.The use of the AI logo though.. That's a no from me dawg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
herewegoagain Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 2 minutes ago, Nightlife said: pro shot footage Oh god I'm getting flashbacks to summer 2017 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punxie89 Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 5 minutes ago, Nightlife said: I love how active they are on social media right now. It's only natural considering the announcement was just made but I sure hope they keep it up! Also hoping they'll make up for the lack of pro shot footage during the RevRad era.The use of the AI logo though.. That's a no from me dawg. It's the most recognized GD related logo, so from a marketing perspective it makes the most sense to use it. If the not-as-well-informed general public saw the barfing unicorn logo they most likely wouldn't know wtf it meant (which is kind of funny...but they want to push sales) 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 10 minutes ago, punxie89 said: It's the most recognized GD related logo, so from a marketing perspective it makes the most sense to use it. If the not-as-well-informed general public saw the barfing unicorn logo they most likely wouldn't know wtf it meant (which is kind of funny...but they want to push sales) I get that, but it doesn't make it valid to use a 15 year old logo in my opinion. It just feels cheap and wrong. Green Day is always about moving forward and they seem particularly keen on that for this era so I don't get why they made the decision to do this. Why not use that god awful Green Day Ketchup Font™ featured on the equally awful album cover instead? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacejunkie punk Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 Everyone’s calling it ketchup but I really think it’s meant to be nail polish. Just saying. 🙂 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 Just now, pacejunkie punk said: Everyone’s calling it ketchup but I really think it’s meant to be nail polish. Just saying. 🙂 I don't think it looks like ketchup either, I just love how people call it that lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacejunkie punk Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 Just now, Nightlife said: I don't think it looks like ketchup either, I just love how people call it that lol Got it. Carry on Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
punxie89 Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 11 minutes ago, Nightlife said: I get that, but it doesn't make it valid to use a 15 year old logo in my opinion. It just feels cheap and wrong. Green Day is always about moving forward and they seem particularly keen on that for this era so I don't get why they made the decision to do this. Why not use that god awful Green Day Ketchup Font™ featured on the equally awful album cover instead? 😂 I can't figure out what it's supposed to be. Coloured art glue? Icing? Nail polish? Paint? I guess it's because it was band logos not writing per se Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grohl Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 It looks like ketchup or raised fabric paint to me 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Squashie Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 1 minute ago, kaylubd said: It looks like ketchup or raised fabric paint to me I going with raised fabric paint, but ketchup is funnier 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 Looks like the paint they were huffing when coming up with that cover to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luketrebilliemike Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 It would be great if there was an entertainment lawyer in our community!! But is this album cover more punk than rev rads generic cover ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
green day is Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 it's clearly acrylic paint??? thought people were joking when they called it ketchup 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AnonymWarnerGermany Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 29 minutes ago, luketrebilliemike said: It would be great if there was an entertainment lawyer in our community!! But is this album cover more punk than rev rads generic cover ? This Album cover is the most random cover ever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 11, 2019 Share Posted September 11, 2019 5 minutes ago, green day is said: it's clearly acrylic paint??? thought people were joking when they called it ketchup Nvm haha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.